The most active critics in the 2025–26 season. Coverage volume, average generosity, and timing position.
KEY INSIGHT
Early reviewers with high coverage are tastemakers. They don't follow consensus — they create it.
Note: All scores are generated by EdgarScore’s AI based on the content of each written review. Critics do not assign numerical scores — the algorithm interprets their judgment.
Loading critic data
02 — HEAD-TO-HEAD
The definitive comparison
Select two books and compare across 6 dimensions.
KEY INSIGHT
Score alone never tells the full story. A book with fewer reviews but higher T1 coverage often has more authority.
Books that reach 3 reviews within 14 days have a 73% higher chance of entering the Top 20.
04 — SOURCE DNA
Editorial fingerprints
Six dimensions reveal a publication's editorial personality.
KEY INSIGHT
A source with high speed but low consensus is a bold tastemaker.
05 — CONTRARIAN INDEX
Who thinks differently?
Not who scores low — who scores differently from everyone else. The Contrarian Index measures the average distance between a critic's score and the average of all other critics who reviewed the same book.
KEY INSIGHT
Two critics can read the same novel and reach opposite conclusions — both with valid arguments. That tension is what makes criticism alive.
Analyzing divergence
Note: An index of 1.0 means, on average, this critic diverges by 1 full point from their peers.
06 — PUBLISHER SCORECARD
Who's winning?
Average EdgarScore, Top 20 rate, tier coverage breakdown.
KEY INSIGHT
Small publishers with high scores and strong T1 coverage are punching above their weight.
MIN BOOKS
YEAR
Loading publishers
07 — AUTHOR MAGNETISM
Who captures attention fastest?
Books that accumulate reviews in concentrated bursts.
KEY INSIGHT
5 reviews in 10 days signals a intense campaign.
WINDOW
YEAR
Loading magnetism
08 — BOOK PERSISTENCE
Which books endure?
The long tail of critical attention.
KEY INSIGHT
Persistent books rarely have the highest launch velocity. Their strength is staying power.
MINIMUM
YEAR
Loading persistence
09 — ALTERNATIVE RANKINGS
Hidden champions
Filter by tier, region, and genre to discover what changes.
KEY INSIGHT
Books that rank higher under T1-only filters have elite critical backing.
TIER
REGION
GENRE
YEAR
🔍ESC
Type to search the ranking
EdgarScore
↓ Continue
tap anywhere to advance
Welcome to
Edgar Score
An AI-powered literary ranking that scores fiction based on professional reviews published online. Written reviews only.
⚖️
Methodology
Not all reviews carry the same weight
Each review is classified into a tier based on the source’s track record and credibility. Major Media carry more weight in the final EdgarScore.
TIER 1
60%
Major Media
TIER 2
30%
Literary Outlets
TIER 3
10%
Independent
✦
Edgar Factor
Elite critics
Some critics have a track record that transcends where they publish. Their literary judgment is a reference in itself.
✦EDGAR FACTOR
If they publish in Tier 2 or Tier 3, their review is evaluated as Tier 1. If already in Tier 1, their opinion counts with double weight.
🔬
Critical Intelligence
Who shapes the conversation?
EdgarScore tracks most critics across the season — who reviews the most, who scores differently from everyone else, and who sets the tone before consensus forms.
INFLUENCE MAP
The most active critics, their coverage volume, timing position, and average generosity.
CONTRARIAN INDEX
Who thinks differently? Critics whose scores diverge most from the consensus.
⚡
Market Signals
Which books capture attention fastest?
Some books accumulate reviews in concentrated bursts — a signal of critical attention. Others endure for months, proving staying power beyond the launch window.
MAGNETISM
5 reviews in 10 days signals a book that demands immediate critical response.
VELOCITY
Review accumulation curves reveal campaign strategy and staying power.
📚
The ranking
Ready to explore
EdgarScore monitors literary outlets across the English-speaking world to build the most relevant ranking of contemporary fiction.
Navigate with ← → arrow keys or click on covers. Use ⌘K to search.
About the project
Edgar Score
A literary ranking that measures how books are received through written criticism.
The project takes its name from Edgar Allan Poe, one of the most rigorous literary critics of the nineteenth century. Poe believed criticism should be analytical, principled, and serious — a discipline capable of judging literature with clarity and intellectual honesty.
EdgarScore follows that spirit. Using artificial intelligence, the platform analyzes written reviews published online — from major newspapers and literary magazines to independent critics, bloggers, and passionate readers who engage seriously with books.
Because literature is a written art, EdgarScore only considers written criticism. Video reactions, social media updates, and short-form reactions are excluded from the system.
Each review is analyzed and converted into a score, producing a ranking based on critical reception rather than popularity.
How it works
The Algorithm
Each review is processed by Claude (Anthropic) via its API:
1
Detects the book
Identifies title, author, publisher, year, reviewer and outlet.
2
Analyzes the arguments
Interprets the reviewer's judgment and highlights an excerpt.
3
Assigns a score
Generates a 0–10 score based on the reviewer's analysis.
Only books with 3 or more reviews enter the official ranking. A minimum score of 6.0 is required. No videos, social media, or interviews.
How is this calculated? → · EdgarScore
Transparency
The Methodology
Every number has a reason. How the ranking is calculated.
Tier weights
🏛️Major Media
60%
National newspaper cultural supplements, literary magazines with decades of history.
NYT · The Guardian · The New Yorker · The Washington Post · The New York Review · TLS
📰Literary Review Outlets
30%
Digital literary magazines, cultural portals, or established reviewers.
London Review of Books · NPR · LA Review of Books · Vulture · The Crimson
✍️Independent Critics
10%
Independent blogs, new outlets, personal columns.
Literary blogs · Substack · Independent reviews
Formula
T₁×0.6+T₂×0.3+T₃×0.1=Score
If a tier has no reviews, its weight is redistributed proportionally.
Rules
3+
minimum reviews
to enter the ranking
6.0
minimum score
to appear
0
videos or social
written text only
∞
possible sources
no limit per book
Edgar Factor ✦
✦
Some reviewers have a track record that transcends the outlet where they publish. Their literary judgment is, in itself, a reference.
The Edgar Factor recognizes these elite critics: if they publish in a Tier 2 or Tier 3 outlet, their review is evaluated as Tier 1. If already in Tier 1, their opinion counts with double weight.
CRITICS WITH EDGAR FACTOR
Loading...
About AI. Claude analyzes what the reviewer says — it does not opine on the book. If a review praises but flags flaws, the score reflects both. Human intervention is limited to curating which reviews to include.